By David Yeh
A Message to the Ethiopian People
This article is written first and foremost to the Ethiopian people, and secondly more directly and more urgently to Ethiopia’s political leadership, intellectual elite, and opinion shapers. It is written in the spirit of truth, responsibility, and historical clarity.
No nation benefits from being misled about matters of war, peace, sovereignty, and law. No people deserve to be mobilized emotionally for conflicts that have already been conclusively resolved by binding international agreements their own state freely signed. And no leadership should gamble with the lives of its citizens by reviving territorial claims that are legally, historically, and morally indefensible.
The Eritrea Ethiopia border issue is one such matter. It has been unambiguously resolved . It is not open for renegotiation. It is res judicata.
The Algiers Agreement: Ethiopia’s Sovereign Commitment
In December 2000 Eritrea and Ethiopia signed the Algiers Agreement. This was not an imposed document; it was a sovereign decision by both states to end war through legal means.
The Agreement established two independent and neutral bodies:
- The Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission (EEBC) – mandated to delimit and demarcate the border.
- The Eritrea–Ethiopia Claims Commission – mandated to address claims arising from the war.
Most importantly, Ethiopia explicitly agreed in advance that the Boundary Commission’s ruling would be: “final and binding”. This phrase was not symbolic. It was legal, intentional, and irreversible.
The 13 April 2002 Decision: Finality in Law
On 13 April 2002, after exhaustive historical, colonial, legal, and cartographic analysis, the EEBC issued its decision. Among its most significant findings was the confirmation that Badme and other contested areas belong to Eritrea. This decision was not rushed. It was not political. It was not arbitrary. It was the product of: Colonial treaties (1900, 1902, 1908), International law, Detailed submissions by both Eritrea and Ethiopia, and Independent legal reasoning by respected jurists. At that moment, the border question ceased to be a political dispute and became a settled legal fact.
Your Leader’s Attempt to Reopen the Case and the Doctrine of Res Judicata
After the ruling, the TPLF regime did not tell you the truth. Instead, it claimed, “we got more than what we asked for; we were awarded land we did not administer even for a single day.” This was a calculated falsehood designed to blur the meaning of a binding legal judgment.
Within days, the same regime sent formal letters to the Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission requesting “adjustments” to what was explicitly declared a final and binding decision. These appeals were not misunderstandings; they were attempts to reopen a closed case through political pressure.
The Commission rejected them categorically. It reminded Ethiopia of a foundational principle that every law student, judge, and serious policymaker understands: res judicata. The matter had been judged. There was no appeal. There was no revision. There was nothing left to negotiate.
The Commission wrote:
“The Commission, through its President, has already stated that the provisions of Articles 28 and 29 of the Rules of Procedure neither allow substantive amendment nor affect the binding quality of the Decision as rendered on 13 April 2002. Re-argument of the case is not permitted.”
To remove any doubt, the Commission grounded its position in classical international jurisprudence:
“Interpretation is a process that is merely auxiliary, and may serve to explain, but may not change, what the Court already settled with binding force as res judicata.”
This principle was affirmed by: The Permanent Court of International Justice in the Chorzów Factory Case (1927), and The France–UK Continental Shelf Arbitration (1978).
In simple terms: No government, no matter how powerful or emotional, can reopen a case that has been finally adjudicated.
Asmara and Jeddah: Acceptance Without Excuses
In July 2018, Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed stood in Asmara and signed a peace declaration explicitly accepting the Eritrea–Ethiopia Boundary Commission (EEBC) ruling without preconditions and committing Ethiopia to its implementation. Two months later, in September 2018, he reaffirmed that commitment by signing the Jeddah Peace Agreement, witnessed by regional and international guarantors.
These were not symbolic gestures or diplomatic theater. They were political confirmations of a legal reality that had existed since 2002.
By those signatures, Abiy Ahmed formally accepted the Algiers Agreement, accepted the binding and final decision of the EEBC, and accepted that Ethiopia has no lawful claim to any Eritrean territory adjudicated by that Commission. That is why the moment was celebrated. It aligned Ethiopian policy with international law and momentarily reopened the door to genuine peace.
When Abiy later told Parliament that “we don’t know who signed it” and that he could not find any document acknowledging that Assab is Eritrean, he did not misspeak. He lied.
The document he personally signed states unambiguously that Ethiopia accepts and will implement the EEBC decision. That decision, in turn, affirmed the Eritrea–Ethiopia border on the basis of the 1908 treaty, signed by Menelik II at his own request, which fixed the boundary sixty kilometers from the Red Sea. That was the internationally recognized border known to the United Nations, and that is the border the EEBC upheld.
When figures such as Aba Dulla, Ambassador Bacha, Field Marshal Berhanu Jula, and others now claim that Assab is “ours,” they are not asserting a legal case. They are manufacturing a pretext for war. It is the same fraud used by Haile Selassie, Mengistu, and Meles: send other people’s children to die in pursuit of territory that international law has never awarded to Ethiopia.
The case did not close in 1993. It closed in 1890, when Eritrea was established as a recognized colonial entity with internationally defined borders. That same historical moment saw the incorporation of Ogaden, Oromia, Sidama, Southern Ethiopia, Southwestern Ethiopia, Central Ethiopia, Gambella, and Benishangul into the modern Ethiopian state. Borders were fixed. Titles were written. Files were closed.
Do not believe the lies now being sold to you. Your leaders know there is no legal claim. They know they will not go to war themselves. They know they will not send their children. As always, it is the poor and the expendable who will be marched to the front so that a few men can posture as kings and princes.
History has already judged this script. It ends the same way every time.
A Direct Address to Ethiopia’s Leadership and Elite
To Ethiopia’s political leadership, military planners, intellectuals, media figures, and self-styled elites: you know, or you have no excuse not to know, that there is no legal basis for claiming a single meter of Eritrean territory adjudicated by the Boundary Commission. You know the ruling is final. You know Ethiopia accepted it not once, but twice. Pretending otherwise is not patriotism; it is willful deception.
Fanning nationalist fervor around a closed legal case is not leadership. It is reckless manipulation. Dressing up a settled judgment as a “dispute” is an insult to law, to reason, and to the public you claim to represent.
To suggest that borders can be altered by pressure, propaganda, or force after a final and binding decision is to sabotage everything that gives states legitimacy: international law, Ethiopia’s own treaty obligations, regional stability, and, most cynically, the lives of ordinary Ethiopians who will be sent to fight for a claim their leaders know does not exist.
This is not ignorance. It is a conscious choice to gamble with blood over a lie.
A Message to the Ethiopian People
To the Ethiopian people: you have already paid for war in blood, in poverty, in displacement, and in stolen futures. You deserve the truth, not slogans.
- No Eritrean territory can be taken legally.
- No historical narrative overrides a final international judgment.
- No volume of rhetoric can reverse res judicata.
If conflict is pursued despite these facts, it will not be because Ethiopia was wronged by law or history, but because some chose—deliberately—to defy both, and to make others pay the price.
Peace Is Not Weakness. It Is Wisdom
The Eritrea Ethiopia border issue is not a matter of opinion. It is a matter of record. The Algiers Agreement settled it. The Boundary Commission judged it. International law sealedit. Ethiopia itself accepted it. To reopen this matter is to reopen tragedy.
True leadership does not huff and puff. It does not bamboozle its people. It does not manufacture enemies where the law has already spoken. Peace, grounded in truth and legality, is not surrender. It is strength.
Discover more from Red Sea Beacon
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
